03 / UIC ME 250 · Fall 2025

Spring-Powered
Autonomous Sled.

A four-person team project for a no-wheel, spring-only sled designed to stop autonomously and signal completion. The work progressed from functional decomposition and CAD into workshop fabrication, breadboard electronics, and actuator integration; quantitative performance validation remains.

Team / we Prototype development Performance testing remains
Design requirements

Spring energy, grounded track, autonomous finish.

≥100 gRequirement / free-standing payload

Team sled must carry at least 100 g while remaining free-standing.

No wheelsRequirement / motion constraint

One or more permitted coil/torsion spring elements provide spring-only propulsion.

Autonomous stopRequirement / completion behavior

Operate on the designated grounded track, stop without human intervention, then provide visual/audio completion signal.

Morphological selection

From combinations to a practical concept.

The team used a functional decomposition and Best-of-Class comparison rather than jumping directly to a single mechanism.

Function-means tree for the autonomous sled
Team design evidence: function-means tree used to structure the concept search.

2,419,200 unconstrained combinations

Initial morphological space.

1,296 feasible → 20 practical → top 5

Constraint and practicality filters narrowed the field.

Concept 9

Best-of-Class result: locking beat tension/friction on cost effectiveness, responsiveness, and reliability; ultrasonic sensing beat photoresistor/PIR on consistency/reliability; LED was the simplest stop indication.

Concept 9 control flow

Sense, lock, signal.

ULTRASONIC SENSOR → ARDUINO LOGIC → SERVO LOCK → LED
Annotated spring-powered sled lock sketch
Annotated team concept sketch: torsion spring, ultrasonic sensor, Arduino, servo, lock, and LED.

Intent

The ultrasonic sensor informs Arduino logic; a servo actuates the lock; LED indicates completion. This is designed evidence for the intended autonomous stop sequence, not measured behavior.

Why locking

Best-of-Class scoring favored locking over tension/friction for cost effectiveness, responsiveness, and reliability.

CAD evolution

Balance and packaging became explicit.

The CAD evolution added two torsion springs and two servos for balance, with electronics centralized in the base.

CAD concept of autonomous spring-powered sled
CAD evidence preceding the workshop build. Quantitative performance testing remains.
Workshop prototype

From system architecture to a physical build.

The workshop sequence documents material preparation, structural fabrication, breadboard electronics, servo-lock integration, and the team establishing a physical test scale. It demonstrates build maturity—not stopping accuracy or payload performance.